Why college athletes should be paid argument?
Paying College Athletes Would Make Them Healthier Another reason why college athletes should be paid is that a student can not manage to study, participate in sports activities, and also work part-time. A student who attempts to do this will end up leading a stressful life, which is not good for his or her health.
Should college athletes be paid opposing viewpoints?
While Landy thinks athletes deserve payment, Melick argues that paying football and basketball players is inequitable. The Opposing Viewpoints series is a space for students with diverse perspectives to answer pertinent questions in conversation with each other.
Should colleges athletes get paid?
Among Americans in general, 51% supported paying college athletes in 2020, according to a study by Ohio State University. In 2019, a combined 53% of students favored or strongly favored paying college athletes a salary, according to CNBC.
What does the NCAA think about paying college athletes?
The NCAA believed that providing scholarships and stipends to athletes was sufficient. Beginning Thursday, Division 1 athletes will have no major restrictions on how they can be compensated for their NIL. In the past, athletes could be suspended or lose eligibility if they violated the rules.
What would happen if college athletes were paid?
Since all student-athletes would likely earn a paycheck for their activities, walk-ons could earn an opportunity to reduce the financial impact of their tuition, room, and board. That means the cost of going to college would go down if you were willing to take up a sport and make the team.
Why should athletes not get paid so much?
Lowering athlete’s salaries could also reduce the cost of going to see them play and buying concessions at games and if the prices don’t change, the money could go to charities. An extra million is enough for some players to switch teams, so lower salaries could make players more loyal to their team and community.
Is paying college athletes unconstitutional?
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court unanimously ruled on Monday that the N.C.A.A. could not bar relatively modest payments to student-athletes, a decision that underscored the growing challenges to a college sports system that generates huge sums for schools but provides little or no compensation to the players.
Should student-athletes be paid?
Since student-athletes also bring in revenue for their team and college or university, especially in the championship games, those who debate in favor of paying them say the students could receive a small portion of the profits.
Should college athletes be paid fair pay?
This may not be considered fair pay, but many of those who argue in support of paying college players point out that team popularity and consumers generally determine what is “fair.” These sports also tend to support other less popular sports that do not bring in a lot of money on their own.
Will paying college athletes make the system worse?
To avoid the possibility of making the college athletics system even worse, people must consider the ramifications of paying college students and ensure that paying athletes doesn’t create more harm than good.
Is it a student’s job to play sports in college?
It is not their job to play sports; it is an extracurricular activity that is pursued while pursuing a higher education. Student-athletes are going to school to learn, and many are lucky enough to do so for reduced cost, given the often generous athletic scholarships.